Democratic Secession from a Multinational State *
نویسنده
چکیده
When Woodrow Wilson advanced the principle of self-determination in a series of speeches in 1918–19, his assumption seemed to be that acknowledging the claims of self-determination was a simple corollary of respect for democracy. Contemporary secessionists, and many who write and theorize about secession, share Wilson’s intuition about this. It is widely claimed that a ‘people’ has the right to determine democratically its own political status, so long as any change is peaceful and orderly, consistent with standard liberal rights, and does not involve any unjust taking of territory or unfair terms of separation. Whatever the considerations are that count in favor of making decisions democratically in
منابع مشابه
Secession, Majority Rule and Equal Rights: a Few Questions
How can one justify the secession of a territory from a liberal-democratic state of the kind currently prevalent in North America and Western Europe? The question does not primarily concern a mutually agreed secession, such as that of Norway from the United Kingdoms of Norway and Sweden in 1905. If the government and legislature of the ‘parent state’ freely agree to a secession of a part of its...
متن کاملDevolution in (Non-)Democracies
The paper develops a very simple model explaining the process of devolution of an individual region in a politically asymmetric country, where a region and the central government bargain over the distribution of tax revenue given a particular tax rate, focusing on the impact of political regime on the decentralization outcome. It finds that under most political settings large regions, regions w...
متن کاملMaximising Consent: Operationalising Reciprocity in Secession Referenda
A constitutional referendum on secession from Indonesia was held in East Timor in 1999, with a pro-independence vote triggering widespread violence by the Indonesian army and pro-union militia. Montenegro underwent a similar process in 2006, also opting for independence but with much smoother results. This article will suggest that the deliberative democratic principle of reciprocity can help d...
متن کاملThe Spread of National Self-Determination: Are recent events leading to the creation of South Sudan anomalous?
As we enter the 21st century, self-determinism is in the air. Most recently in July of 2011 when the newly formed state of South Sudan seceded from Sudan as a result of a territorial dispute in which a group of citizens challenged and denied the authority of the central government in their region. Self-determinism as a goal is manifest in secession. Secession is not only a division of one peopl...
متن کاملThe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2006. HiT summary
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia was established as a parliamentary democracy in 1991 when, after 45 years as part of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, a peaceful secession took place. The Constitution of 1991 determines the basic principles of the democratic system, establishing civil freedoms and dividing power into legislative, executive and judicial branches. The execut...
متن کامل